Case Decisions and Policy Advisory Opinions
The Oversight Board reviews Meta’s content decisions to see if the company acted in line with its own policies, values and human rights commitments. The Board can choose to overturn or uphold Meta’s decision.
Case Decisions
All three types result in binding decisions that Meta must implement.
Standard
In-depth review of Meta’s decision to remove or allow a post, which includes recommendations.
Summary
Analysis of Meta’s original decision on a post when the company later changes its mind, after the Board selects the case for review.
Expedited
Rapid review of Meta’s decision on a post in exceptional situations with urgent real-world consequences.
Standard
Overturned
2026-004 FB-UA
AI-Generated Video in Israel-Iran Conflict
In analyzing the spread of AI-generated content in armed conflicts in a case on the 2025 Israel-Iran war, the Oversight Board calls on Meta to do more to allow users to identify such output.
Summary
Overturned
2026-024-FB-UA
Post Stating “Stop Hiring Khmer People”
A user appealed Meta’s decision to leave up a Facebook post in Thai stating: “Stop hiring Khmer people.”
Summary
Multiple Case Decision
2026-022-FB-UA, 2026-023-FB-UA
Press Release by the Oromo Liberation Front
Separately, two users appealed decisions by Meta to remove a post of theirs each, both of which shared a press release from the Oromo Liberation Front (OLF), a political party advocating for the self-determination of the Oromo people in Ethiopia.
POLICY ADVISORY OPINIONS
Meta can also ask the Board for guidance on specific issues through policy advisory opinions. These are integrated into the company’s policy development process.
Published
PAO-2023-01
Referring to Designated Dangerous Individuals as “Shaheed”
This policy advisory opinion analyzes Meta's approach to moderating the word “shaheed,” raising important questions about the impact of the Dangerous Organizations and Individuals policy on freedom of expression.
Published
PAO-2022-01
Removal of COVID-19 misinformation
This policy advisory opinion examines whether Meta should continue to remove certain categories of COVID-19 misinformation, or whether a less restrictive approach would better align with its values and human rights responsibilities.
Published
PAO-2021-02
Meta’s cross-check program
This policy advisory opinion analyzes Meta’s cross-check program, raising important questions around how Meta treats its most powerful users.
